Tag Archive: electricity


Secret Squirrel has known about and seen a great inequity,inequality,unfairness,use and abuse suffered by the
people of the City Of Kitchener as compared with those of the City of Waterloo,and environs such that the people of Kitchener,served by Kitchener Utilities with respect to the supply of natural gas, as opposed to those of Waterloo and environs supplied natural gas by Union Gas, such that those in Kitchener are supplied with natural gas at the massive rate(and have been for some years),of 7.6cents per cubic meter,versus those of Union Gas who are supplied at 3.72cents per cubic meter,in short those of Kitchener utilities are paying twice the rate those of Union gas are paying. Now they are claims etc. explanations etc. by those of Kitchener Council to “explain” it all, but in view of the massive difference in rates, none of then carry water,are acceptable,nor sufficient to explain any and all of the twice rate difference.What comes to mind in general is
incompetence, none of which will ever be brought forward, in short there will be no firings and blame layed for it,it of course reflects the area, it’s cronyism as it were, and as they say,there’s no crone like an old crone.The people will never recover from this event,they will only and have, suffered financially and in terms of comfort, struggling though winters in cold whilst those of other areas do not and did not, and indeed
I shall say with their superior managements, shall not.

Kitchener Utilities customers paid total of $138M above market rates, watchdog says,for 2009 to 2013.One sees there was a profit in it,unquestionably, but they won’t mention whom this massively hurtfully abusive price gouge ended up with.

Let us here look what was said of it all,and here I cite……..

http://www.therecord.com/news-story/4145539-kitchener-utilities-customers-paid-total-of-138m-above-market-rates-watchdog-says/

And to commence,quote,

The customers of Kitchener Utilities collectively paid an estimated $138 million above market rates for natural gas during the 2009-2013 period, says city-hall watchdog Harald Drewitz.

Drewitz, the founder and spokesperson for Kitchener Tax Watch Group, made his calculations after a long and feisty exchange with city councillors Monday about how much the city-owned company charges for natural gas. Drewitz based his estimate on the gas bills of Coun. John Gazzola.

Gazzola told the meeting that during 2009-2013, he paid an average of 95 per cent above market rates for natural gas, and that totalled about $2,100. Drewitz took that figure and multiplied it by the number of
customers at Kitchener Utilities — 66,000.

“To me it is something serious,” Gazzola said. “We need to take a close look at it and we need to do it sooner rather than later.”

And herewith,unquote.

Sooner,later…well it will come to an end, eventually, not this highly profitable heating season either, not likely,I wouldn’t bet on it, and I won’t bet on recompense for those forced to heat with the natural gas
supplied but the local monopolistic Kitchener Utilities which levied the charges on the people of Kitchener, whom strangely enough, after years of abuse went to Kitchener Council, though why they should have done this is anybodies guess for what does the city council do, nor have to do with the supply and rates of gas then.as a matter of fact they should be as powerless as an Indian eunuch,but the locals don’t seem to think so,
going there to present complaints.The horse has bolted, the barn door is closed,the ears are deaf, the abusive profits, the massively ridiculous price gouging affected, and the profiteers, enriched immensely,and are
utterly completely, safe, and laughing all the way to the bank as the people of Kitchener struggle to heat their homes and families as they did in past winters, and in the present winter.Yes, it is the winter of the
discontent of the people of Kitchener.Their council will offer and did offer no solution, certainly no form of comparable recompense to recover ANY of the massive expenses they have incurred and will be FORCED TO incur this coming cold winter.Squirrel has complained in  the past, and been ignored in all this time, but Squirrel has tried for the good of the people, but Squirrel’s complaints fell on deaf ears,they ignored Squirrel,and so too then also the people of Kitchener for that matter,lo these many years.

Squirrel tho, offers some assistance however in hopes people may ease their massive natural gas heating bills suffer,bills TWICE that of those in other areas,those paying twice the rates to Kitchener Utilities as opposed to those of the vastly better managed,run and governed area, those served by Union gas. We must ponder alternatives to heating, to have some viable options open to use. Here we must ponder the option of Electrical heating methods, using so called space heaters, oil filled portables, ceramic heaters ( I prefer these to radiant types,far,far less, of a fire hazard).Lets look at electric rates.

Here we consider first calculation of cents cost versus kilowatts,kilowatt hours, here using the figure of a supposed 6cents per kilowatt hour, tho we all know that rate has gone by the board a considerable time ago,
but actual rates will be taken in to account once you see how the actual valid and working calculations go.

1,300 watts ÷ 1,000 (watts per kWh)

1.3kWh x 6¢ per hour = 7.8¢ per hour

Wattage of appliance ÷ 1,000 x Hours used per month = kWh per month

To figure operating cost per month:

kWH used per month x Your cost per kWh = Operating cost per month

Thermostatically controlled appliances are not “on” 100 percent of the time. An electric oven, for example, is “on” about 50 percent of the time when baking.

Now, we’re considering heating here, of course, your other electric costs are extra, but necessary. But look at your heating costs,here discussed in Kitchener,Ontario, paying twice the natural gas consumption and
delivery costs per cubic meter to Kitchener Utilities(and whoever is associated with it), versus the half rate of Kitchener utilities, in Waterloo, through and by Union Gas.

Now average total electric for everybody in the Kitchener and Waterloo area,whilst its true rates are different at different times,since there are time of use charges equitably in effect for all,averages out at
9.83cents per kw hour(off peak is 6.7cents /kw hour at 7am to 7pm,basic night rate, 10.4 cents per kw hour at what they call mid peak, 5pm to 7pm and also at 7am to 11pm, and peak 11am to 5pm at 12.4cents per kw hour.)

Now a 1500 watt heater say it runs 4 hours total per day(heaters are on off as thermostat),So four times 1500watts gives us 6000watts per day, and 180,000 watts in a 30 day month(180 Kilowatt hours) times averaged gives $17.69 per such a space heater, assume 4 running upstairs, 1 basement for 5, that’d be 5 times the $17.69 for $88.45 additional on your electric bill added to your regular necessary electric use,per months the space heaters(electric ceramics, or oil filled) are used. Of course your electric bill also has added costs besides your actual usage,there is a delivery charge, which on my regular bill is approximately half(though somewhat less), than my usage rates.Basically this would double my electric bill, say from $100 per month to $200 per month(with some left over really).Thankfully any influence over rates extends far and wide beyond Kitchener City area,to a provincial balance. So what I am suggesting to you in Kitchener, the serviced area of Kitchener Utilities natural gas service is to unquestionably purchase the electric space heaters, of your selection, though I recommend oil filled and the ceramic heaters, and to augment your winter natural gas heating and so very much lower your winter heating natural gas bills,which,without are going to be massive indeed, and the massive profits accrued through your having to heat with natural gas, being supplied to..those who are unquestionably gouging massively you, the public, you, and your family. Compare Kitchener utilities, rates versus those of outside Kitchener,the area served by Union Gas….

Kitchener Utilities
7.6 cents/cubic metre

Union gas
3.72 cents/cubic metre

Naturally even the village edit in Kitchener can see that easily those in Waterloo and other environs are experiencing a natural gas bill easily of half of Kitchener’s,happily heating their homes and experiencing warmth and ease of bill payments. It is pointed out that those on welfare are immune to rates, they simply demand, and get the various monies necessary for payment, whilst enjoying, the good warm life.

Punished,used,abused, are those who must work to pay their bills, and the retired,who live off meagre pensions and their dwindling life savings.
Is there a solution for Kitchener, the people of Kitchener, with respect to their Kitchener Council which could and wouldn’t and didn’t legislate reductions,which allowed this to go on to the people of Kitchener for years,and years, AND, Kitchener Utilities which set the rate and demands payment? Well there is, the province could declare a trusteeship with respect to gas management as Kitchener,Kitchener Utilities has proven incapable and abusive and  certainly it needs better management.The province could take over gas rates such that the rates are fair and equitable to and for all,as occurs with the electric rate(so, we do know that system works fair and equitably),for the good of the people. What also could be done, is Union gas could be allowed to canvass in Kitchener to supply natural gas to the people at their rate as well, and so too, in all fairness to Kitchener Utilities (and Kitchener Council would see this as fair as well),could also canvas Waterloo and environs and offer their rates,in all fairness and equity,equality to and for all.And so, says Secret Squirrel.

If you have ever been curious about how much power can be generated while running on a treadmill, you will now easily find out. Power is defined as the rate at which you burn energy. As long as you know how much energy you burn in a given amount of time–something most modern treadmills can estimate for you–you can calculate your average power output during your workout. The calculation will require a few steps and unit conversions, but is relatively simple overall.

Firstly set up your treadmill to count the calories you burn during your workout. Usually, you will be
asked to enter your age, height and weight to enhance the accuracy of the calorie counter. Consult your
treadmill’s manual for detailed instructions on how to do this.

Now complete the workout for which you want to calculate your power output. For example, consider a half-hour workout during which you burn 800 calories.

Next convert the calories to joules, the scientific unit of energy that will be required to calculate
power in watts. Keep in mind that the capitalized “Calories” displayed on your treadmill–and on the nutrition labels of foods for that matter–are actually kilocalories. There are 4,186 joules in a
kilocalorie, so the calculation to convert 800 kilocalories to joules would look like this:

800 kilocalories x 4186 joules / kilocalorie = 3,348,800 joules

Calculate your power output by dividing the energy you burned by the amount of time, in seconds, it took you to burn it. There are 1800 seconds in your half-hour workout, so:3,348,800 joules / 1800 seconds = 1860.4 joules per second = 1860.4 watts.Your average power output during your half-hour workout was 1860.4 watts, or 1860.4 joules per second.

Now Convert watts to horsepower, if you like, by dividing the wattage by 745.8, the number of watts in a horsepower. For example:1860.4 watts / (745.8 watts per horsepower) = 2.5 horsepower

Pretty good isn’t that. Imagine if the fatman was converted to farmwork to pull a plow, he would be only really asked to do the work of either a one horse plow, or at worst case sceneario, a two horse
team……..conceiveably they,the fat people,the obese,the lards or whatever you would,could and do call them, could be employed on farms as a much cheaper alternative to a tractor,Mennonites,The Amish, The Pennsylvania Dutch could be rented these lards to apply them to plowing the fields by a completely acceptable, non mechanical means of plowing………in exchange for room and board………..and……………food.

But there’s more to things than that, on said treadmill each fatman could have their treadmill hooked such as to power an electrical generator and so contribute to the electricalGrid,creating electrical energy,electricity.

A large amount of fatties in a local gym scenario could provide a vast amount of electrical generated energy to contribute to the local power grids a specific workout times.A specific comic strip,Dilbert mentioned something in the scenario of…..

“Scientists will eventually stop flailing around with solar power and focus their efforts on harnessing the only truly unlimited source of energy on the planet: stupidity. I predict that energy companies will place huge hamster wheels outside of convenience stores and offer free lottery tickets to people who spend five minutes running in them. The hamster wheels will be connected to power generators.
– The Dilbert Future ”

Well they’re somewhat in the ball park as to a working idea, just their idea of using lottery tickets
to attract those to turn the hamster wheel treadmills………rather t’is better to use the fatman,
nicht whar…….indeed even yet to legislate that those above a certain BMI must report to local
hamsterwheel or treadmill fat generating stations at specific times of the day, the time and time on a treadmill determined by specific BMI mass being at a certain point above normal levels.Indeed local Health Centers could be employed as such for their treadmiils, everybody else continuing to exercise as normal on other apparatus at their leisure(they are also referred to as leisure centers as so would most definitly be in that regard.),but the local certers would become readily online energy adding stations to a local power grid, making fat people useful members of society.

I realized there was a great use and need for fat people,in modern society, uses such that they would
be employed properly, without actually abusing them, helping them,as it were?Yes, indeed, and this is
an idea that occurred to me as I visited the local “fat” farm, the exercise,den of iniquity, at least
from the point of view of the fat, which was strangely visited only by the thin,the lean, the slim, who
wished to stay so. Consider now, a power plant with water wheels and the people run in them like
hamsters—> benefits= loss of weight and power saving, people dont get mad…pay them to loose weight
whilst adding energy to the world.these people them supplying America with free energy. How much
energy? A lot of free energy! There are 3,500 calories in 1 pound of bodyweight. An average obese man
weighing at a modest 300lbs. will contain 1,050,000 calories. Since there are 14,644 Joules in 3500
calories, a 300lbs person can provide over 4,393,200 Joules(4,393.2 KJ) of pure energy. One kilo-joule
per second equates to one kilo-watt. The average U.S. household uses one kilo-watt of energy every
second. Therefore, 4,393.2 KJ/60 seconds amounts to over 73.22 minutes of power for the average U.S.
household. So that fat guy you see eating a sandwich at work can potentially power your whole house for
over an hour.HEALTH and energy chiefs need to consider Squirrel’s plan to make fat people power
turbines by forcing them to run in giant hamster wheels,turning suitable electrical generators, thus
contributing to any particular city’s power grid!!

Now in Denmark, ponder this……..Danish Hotel Pays Its Guests to Generate Electricity on Exercise
Bikes

Just 15 minutes of cycling can produce 10 watt-hours of electricity, and earn you a free meal.Bored
guests at a certain Crowne Plaza hotel can now skip the pricey mini-bar and hop on an exercise bike,
generate some electricity, and earn some meal vouchers. The hotel in Copenhagen started the free meal
idea as a way to boost guests’ fitness and shrink their carbon footprint, according to the BBC.
The bikes are hooked up to generators that require guests of average fitness to pedal for about 15
minutes to create 10 watt-hours of electricity. iPhones attached to the handlebars display the amount
of power being generated.Hitting the 15-minute mark earns lucky exercisers a $36 meal voucher, and that’s presumably on a
repeatable reward system.Now what about making that manditory for Fatties, yes, indeed, making them work
to generate electricity, making them literally pimp themselves, to work for food they actually earn
whilst generating energy for electricity to be added to the nation’s power grid! This can be adapted to
the Health Center Energy Generating Sections, such that the Fat People so “employed” to generate
electricity, will also have to generate electricity to EARN their keep, to pay for their food at
mealtime.A capital idea eh whot!

Don’t feel sorry for them, no…consider the famous words……..

“Inside some of us is a thin person struggling to get out, but they can usually be sedated with a few pieces of
chocolate cake.”
– Anonymous

Yes, an all round jolly good show! Fat people at work for society! Loosing weight contributing to
society!Generating lost of free electricity! Whilst helping themsleves and loosing weight! Yes, and the
generating electricity so that they can eat,and KEEP they fat they so desire! Amazingly and
interestingly and useful vicious cycle!

Remember the words of Mike Meyers FAT BASTARD…..

“I eat because I’m unhappy, and I’m unhappy because I eat. It’s a vicious cycle.”

That’ll change to

“I generate electrcity because I’m fat, to loose weight, I generate electricity to gain money to eat,
to keep me fat.It’s a vicious cycle.”

But………………society benefits.

Secret Squirrel,
MRL,MP,(Dunny On The Wold),
Minister For Re-Deranged Re-Engin

Secret Squirrel examines,now, the costs of fuels comparing nuclear fuels used in nuclear reactors and those used by thermal plants,all resulting in the same end, heating,boiling water, to generate steam to turn steam turbines, to generate electricity.
First we’ll look at nuclear fuels and the processing it actually requires.

Steps to create the fuel,(all involve transportation)

1-Mining,and milling
2-Conversion
3-Enrichment
4-Fuel Bundle fabrication
5-Used in Nuclear reactor to boil water,generate steam to turn a turbine.
6-Must be stored beneath water else catches fire and releases radiations(gases ,particles),goes to 7 (or sometimes then straight to 9,burial)
7-Reprocessing (seperating the to be waste products)
8-Vitrification (waste preprocessing)
9-Final disposal for burial

So nuclear fuel and it’s manufacture and use is cheaper thermal plant fuels?Hardly likely.In no way shape nor form is it so,not at all, not in the long term,nor in the short term.And, compared with the thermal fuels, the whole business,and process all along the way,all along the line, is extremely,highly,dangerous,hazardous,life threatening,an accident of nuclear proportions waiting to happen anywhere along its line,from manufacture on up to, and including burial disposal, and even there, in burial remains dangerous for decades.

Now that’s certainly a lot of processes.France and the UK do all,but NOT mined.Japan does not mine nor vitrify,The USA and Russia does all including mine, but does not vitrify.Other nations do some work with the uranium.But it requires, all along the way, highly expensive to build, plants, plants to handle increasingly radioactive materials to assemble a fule bundle necessary for a reactor to use, and just note how very few such plants exist to do exactly that. Uranium mining nations are Australia,USA,Canada,Namibia,Niger,Argentina,Russia,Germany, Ukraine,Roumania,Spain,Khazakstan, mainly because they have it elementally. All nations have coal,and natural gas,and there are many yet more oil producing nations as compared with the highly restricted short list of nations which have uranium mines.

Russia and Lithuania use over 70% nuclear,Japan,Germany,Sweden,Switzerland,Hungary, Slovenia,Slovakia,Ukraine,Bulgaria over 30%.Russia,Finland,Spain,England,Czechs are over 15%, rest region 15%,and some very fortunate nations, not at all, like Australia,Italy,Turkey, Norway,Ireland,Greece, and some others, the smarter than average ones.Indeed they have other sources to generate electricity,efficiently,economcially, safely, and far less expensively.

Now let’s consider the thermal plants, in particular,coal fired ones.

To get coal to the same useable state to be used to generate the steam required to turn electrical turbines, its mined, and transported to the thermal plant, there it’s pulverized,mixed with hot air and injected in to the furnace,to boil water,generate steam to turn the turbine,which gives the electricity.That’s all there really is to it.Oil and natural gas similarly.Some coal
fired plants are built right near to the mines themselves, so near the coal is delivered by simple conveyer.Simple and cheap,isn’t it.Coal can also be effectively delivered by train right to the plant.Natural gas plants are simply built adjacent to the natural gas pipelines.Smart move that is.Fuel for bunker oil fired plants can be delivered by pipeline,tanker,rail tank cars,safely ,cheaply.They too can be built right near to the supply pipeline.

Now for coal, or rather from coal, there is a residue left,a waste product,that of coal ash. Now coal ash is nowhere’s near as dangerous as nuclear waste.As a matter of fact,it has a great many applicable uses, and can be thence sold in to the economy.What uses you ask? Well there are a great many.

It’s used for making cement and concrete products
It’s used in structural fills and embankments
It’s used as mineral filler in asphalt pavement
It’s used to stabilize waste materials
It’s used to level out uneven terrain on sites including housing developments, malls and runways.

To be used in this way, coal ash must meet certain requirements.
For example, in Portland Cement Concrete, fly ash must meet the standards of ASTM C618. The ASTM is the American Society for Testing and Materials.The ash used to produce Portland cement actually allows some cutbacks in using oil. It would have taken 55 gallons to produce one ton of cement.

Coal ash has also been found useful in the making of:

Paints and plastics
Kitchen countertops
Soil for growing plants. It increases crop yields.
Bowling balls
Vinyl flow covering
Shower stalls

Gee just try and do that with still heavily radioactive waste, as in fuels etc etc etc.

(http://www.coalashfacts.org/)
In epistle,

“In 2007, the United States produced 131 million tons of coal combustion products. While 43 percent were used beneficially, nearly 75 million tons were disposed of. By using coal ash instead of disposing of it in landfills we are avoiding the environmental degradation and energy costs associated with mining virgin materials. We are building stronger, longer-lasting
structures that save taxpayer dollars and minimize environmental impacts. For every ton of fly ash used in place of portland cement about a ton of carbon dioxide is prevented from entering the Earth’s atmosphere. Also, it takes the equivalent of 55 gallons of oil to produce a single ton of cement.

Another significant benefit of using fly ash is that it requires less water than portland cement, conserving a limited resource, while also reducing a project’s water and equipment costs. Boiler slag, which replaces sand in blasting grit, has the benefit of being free of silica, which eliminates the potential health risk of silicosis. Flue gas desulfurization materials are used in 30
percent of U.S. wallboard products, avoiding the need to mine gypsum. Environmentally and economically it makes more sense to use existing materials than to mine new ones.And it also makes much more sense,environmentally and financially,economically to use thermal in place of nuclear”.Her ends the epistle.

Talk is cheap, nuclear isn’t.Thermal talks the talk, walks the walk,safely,efficiently, inexpensively,cheaply.Nuclear is a much more costly,unjustifiable loss leader in the field of electrical energy generation.Nuclear energy is a looser,a financial looser,which takes you with it.

Secret Squirrel has noticed that there is a study which claims that nuclear energy is the safest way to generate electricity…………balderdash,falderall, friends of theirs, those and the mentally disturbed, the insane,as a matter of fact I use those who support nuclear as my measure of insanity,anyone else can at the most be a little bit fruity with regards to anything and everything else.

In Japan, there is radioactivity in the soil, the food is contaminated,you cannot eat the spinach, nor broccoli, nor anything else in that LARGE region, you cannot drink the water, you cannot eat the beef,the cows are contaminated and everything else in terms of edible farm animals,ground water is contaminated, miles away.There is radioactivity in the seawater at massive levels, contaminating the fish and rendering them unconsumable.The radiation cloud has been detected, in Canada,in the USA, in Scotland, Britain,Ireland, and again in Sweden which first detected what turned out to be Chernobyl.

Speaking of Chernobyl, the Japanese plant explosions,fires,radiation leaks, is yet many times less.So what is it all from? A meltdown? No they claim it’s only a partial meltdown on one reactor…..hooray, thankfully it wasn’t a full meltdown..of even one, yes it WOULD be worse, as logic dictates, then there’s explosion, which they said didn’t occur, but it can and may, it did at Chernobyl, and that is even yet worse,as has been proven, and as logic dictates.What have they said?It’s many times less than Chernobyl.

What was Chernobyl?Well,it was the worst nuclear accident to date was the Chernobyl disaster which occurred in 1986 in Ukraine. That accident killed 56 people directly, and caused an estimated 4,000 additional cases of fatal cancer, as well as damaging approximately $7 billion of property. Radioactive fallout from the accident was concentrated in areas of Belarus, Ukraine and Russia. Approximately 350,000 people were forcibly resettled away from these areas soon after the incident. Recent estimations say that between 400,000 and 500,000 inhabitants (when including unborn children) near Kiev province had been exposed to a comparatively high dose of radiation, and there’s a possibility of developing cancer, leukemia and DNA malformation in the next 10 to 40 years……..What did and do they say?Chernobyl cannot happen again………….what will they say in Japan? It a
Fukushima cannot happen again?

There HAVE been other major and massive events……

October 1957

Fire destroyed the core of a plutonium-producing reactor at Britain’s Windscale nuclear complex – since renamed Sellafield –

sending clouds of radioactivity into the atmosphere. An official report said the leaked radiation could have caused dozens of

cancer deaths in the vicinity of Liverpool.
Winter 1957-’58

A serious accident occurred during the winter of 1957-58 near the town of Kyshtym in the Urals. A Russian scientist who first

reported the disaster estimated that hundreds died from radiation sickness.

October 5, 1966

The core of an experimental reactor near Detroit, Mich., melted partially when a sodium cooling system failed.

March 28, 1979

Near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, America’s worst nuclear accident occurred. A partial meltdown of one of the reactors forced the evacuation of the residents after radioactive gas escaped into the atmosphere.

You can compare, the events are beyond compare……and the effects, and effects on the public……….hidden.And there is a study which says nuclear energy is the safest way to generate electricity.But it is the government who dictates,it is the government  who dictates the nuclear plants,and it is the government who did
dictate the nuclear plants, and who claim they aren’t responsible for the failures and accidents concerning nuclear plants,the explosions, the fires, the releases of radiations.well they aren’t responsible,they can’t possibly be,they claim it is the
electorate who are responsible,regardless of their decisions, we have yet to have responsible governments, only governments of idiocy,stupidity,cretinism, imbecillity,ignorance et all.And the study,claims that nuclear energy is the safest way to generate electricity. Numerous cities within a 20km radius, had to be evacuated, due to the presence of radiation and hazards which proved to be true. Chernobyl was even yet worse. Who can calculate now the dead and dying from the effects of radiation from these areas,those who will suffer cancerous growths, and deaths, and their children horrific mutations……….and the study says that nuclear energy is the safest way to generate electricity.Well, coal and oil and gas fired thermal plants don’t cause all this to happen when something happens internally to them, nor does it happen to geothermal, nor to hydroelectric energy
generation, nor to stored storage types of electrical generation system,and wind power.The study claims that nuclear energy is the  safest way to generate electricity.Chernobyl,Pripyat, still empty and abandoned,radiation rained down on it, and it is still in the soil…….the area bout Fukushima…evacuated, radiation rained down on it, and it is still in the soil.The cost of nuclear energy is quite high,extremely high, far too high.Who’s paying for the evacuated people,who’s going to pay for the farmers and their lost livelihood,the crops and animals, the fishermen and their lost livelihood, the closed and abandoned businesses,who’s going to pay for the health lost to those affected by the radiation,who’s going to pay for their mutated children,who’s going to pay for what can’t ever be replaced, who’s going to pay for human life?

In Canada,Toronto,the largest population city in that nation,  is 17 miles from the Pickering Reactor group.Where will the Canadian government evacuate them to.Will it evacuate them anywhere?Will it simply tell them get out of town? More than likely just the latter, there will be NO help from them, from their governments,they will tell them that when they voted for them, they voted for nuclear, and they will tell them that as THEY are forced to evacuate wherever they can and may.The people will be left to fend for themselves…..the people of Toronto.The massive numbers of people in hospitals will be left.Canada has not the capability to evacuate a city the size of Toronto,not even yet those in hospitals,old peoples homes etc., and so too it is for the rest of you near nuclear plants.You will be on your own and
told to leave,as they did in Japan…..all they will tell you is…….that’s all folks.The politicians will be taken care of,unquestionably.But not you.
And the study claims that nuclear energy is the safest way to generate electricity.

Secret Squirrel has researched wind turbines, and their present uses,and has figured a way to reliably multiply their output cheaply,inexpensively, at a massive multiplied return,without relying on the uncertain availability of wind at any particular time,direction, and available speed force.Presently 50,000 wind turbines globally produce 50billion kwh……….powered by wind, sometimes there, sometimes not, and are dependent on wind speed…….they average,according to wind speed,say 33mph constant, with propeller blades size as follows:

10 meters 25kw output

80 meters 2500kw output

(To convert KW into watts multiply KW (x) 1000,1000watts is 1kw.
A typical 1/8hp motor depends on type being 275watts,(.275kw)if standard, to 850watts(.850kw) if Capacitor type.)